Bipartisan support should be immediate. For fiscal conservatives, it’s hard to come up with a more wasteful agency than the TSA. For privacy advocates, eliminating an organization that requires you to choose between a nude body scan or genital groping in order to board a plane should be a no-brainer.
But won’t that compromise safety? I doubt it. The airlines have enormous sums of money riding on passenger safety, and the notion that a government bureaucracy has better incentives to provide safe travels than airlines with billions of dollars worth of capital and goodwill on the line strains credibility. This might be beside the point: in 2003, William Anderson incisively argued that some of the steps that airlines (and passengers) would have needed to take to prevent the 9/11 disaster probably would have been illegal. - forbes.com
And the question is being asked — is all this dissuading people from flying? Of course it is. I know people who have said “Never again!” A co-worker of mine nearly passed up free accommodations on St. Maarten just because he was afraid he couldn’t tolerate the security scan/grope.
Vote here.
(Brad)
And why does OBOW so often focus on “travel insecurity” news? Because our readers are likely to be frequent, serious travelers who make a great deal of effort to travel efficiently - just the type to be most affected and vexed by security theater. Avoiding checked luggage used to be the ticket to travel bliss. The checkpoint hassle has greatly offset this. Knowledge (about the security protocols) should equal power. Alas, all are powerless before the big blue monster.
And behind every fetid, corrupt, stupid, Washington-hatched fiasco you’ll find — surprise, surprise — a bi-partisan cabal of lobbyists.