Quantcast
Forum

 

SEARCH THIS BLOG
« Touching an iPad | Main | Is the solution 10/22? »
Thursday
Apr152010

Flight attendants vs. carry-ons

Reader Comments (8)

Yeah well the greedy airlines these flight attendants work for have caused this problem by charging for checked luggage, so why should anyone feel sorry for them
April 15, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterPhillip
In all our flying we have never seen such dangerous problems with overhead storage. It may happen, but hardly ever do flight attendants help passengers. It is more often the case that other passengers help. If size and weight limits were adhered to most of the problems would go away. Wheelies should be banned inside the cabins, in terminals, on trains, on busses, and from society in general. If you can't carry it, don't take it.
April 15, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterMonte
Flagship airlines flight attendants have whined for years about carry on causing them injuries.

Yet, every time I flew with them, it was my travel companion or other passengers who helped me put my bag up.
Other times, I have seen a flight attendant move my bag and coat around, squishing them to make room for a guy's bag, the guy would have been able to do it himself but the flight attendant was more than happy to help and "shake her bonbon" to boot.
That same person looked "peeved" when I took the time to set up my bag and coat nicely during boarding.

The best solution is to forgo flying with U.S flagship airlines.

Southwest, Jet Blue have very attending flight attendants and I have heard that Virgin America is very good.


Very soon, flagship airlines flight attendants will have to apply for TSA jobs if they keep that up.
April 15, 2010 | Unregistered Commenterbackpack
I've looked at the video again and another thought came into my mind. The average age of flight attendants is older than it was ten or fifteen years ago. As a matter of fact some of them seem near my age. Those of us who's bodies are changing because of the ageing process can tell you that physical strength, coordination, dexterity, and other physical attributes diminish as one gets older, and not at the same rate in each individual. That leads me to think that some injuries caused
to attendants by putting bags in overheads may just be the result of growing older.

I'm with Backpack on this issue.
April 16, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterMonte
"That leads me to think that some injuries caused to attendants by putting bags in overheads may just be the result of growing older."

As a physician who has treated a flight attendant for a back injury, related to having to hurriedly stuff a FIFTY pound Halliburton case into an overhead bin just prior to a UAL 747 taking off from SFO to Tokyo, allow me to DISSENT. NIOSH, National Institutes of Occupational Health and Safety, defined SIX types of lifting, and relative capacity for such, males versus females (capacity for any given type for females being about 36% less.)

NO surprise that #4, the "High Far Lift," which best approximates putting a piece of luggage into an overhead bin, is associated with the LOWEST maximal ability, 50th percentile for women being 29 lbs., 25th percentile being 24 lbs, a SAFE lift being clearly less than that, not to mention the vagaries that luggage is clumsier than a test object.

The flight attendants have a valid contention, and the data supporting it is NOT new; travelers need to support their concerns!

from:

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Public Health Service
DCenters for Disease Control
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Heealth
Division of Biomedical and Behavior Ascience
Sincinnati, Ohio 45226
March 1981
April 16, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterAlan Birnbaum
Flight attendants should simply not help anyone but the obviously frail. A 40lb limit on carry-ons would be more than reasonable. Women should learn to pack so that they can stow the bag themselves without asking anyone for help.

This is not misogynistic. Women are smaller and their clothes are lighter. Yet they take the same size suitcases as men and often bigger ones. Anyone who has ever traveled can attest to that. It's not a stereotype. It's a general rule that has wonderful exceptions but overall it's plain true. So they fill a same size suit case with more clothes even though they are lighter. If we submit that women need the same number of clothing items per day as a man and that each item is lighter and smaller than the male counter part, a woman's case should be lighter and smaller, too. Now when is the last time you saw an 18-50 year old man not being able to lift his luggage into the overhead? I've never seen that. But I bet you have seen women in that age bracket needing help. I know because I've helped. Do it on almost every flight.

Even if you account for women being capable of lifting 36% less than men, the fact that their clothes are lighter and smaller and that the bag CAN be lighter and smaller, too, SHOULD result in an equivalent weight reduction.

Whether one woman takes offense at another woman shaking her bonbon (nice expression) for a male passenger is something that women have to take out among themselves. We males won't complain. We will complain however if a lady handles her anorak like a bride's dress and gives it an extra spot in the bin that takes up as much room as an MLC case. Not uncommon. If she then takes her time on top of it, guess who we prefer. The nice FA who helps us stow our stuff and does a little bonbon shaking or the overpacking, space usurping high maintenance lady? (not personally directed to the above poster, just a general observation)

On a personal note, somewhat related to age and physical ability but also to bonbon shaking, I haven't seen any remotely appealing FAs on any American airline in the last eight years. Most of them are the old and jaded kind. Very experienced, no doubt. But if ever there is a little bonbon shaking from someone actually worth looking at, please don't spoil the fun. It's rare enough. :)
April 17, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterTill
I can't help but think that there is an artificiality to this climate, where it's passenger against passenger and passenger versus flight attendant. In recent years, airlines realized that a greater profit could be obtained by stowing cargo in their hulls. Also, much of why passengers began carrying on luggage to begin with was- the high probability of loss or theft of their belongings. Also, the number of people with carry on luggage (rather than checked luggage) jumped exponentially when the airlines decided to charge for the privilege of stowing baggage in their hulls. Passenger behavior (for the better or worse) has merely adapted over time to these inconveniences.
April 17, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterLaurie
What fascinates me is that some airlines standards are tighter than the bill's standards. UAL's bag limit for a carry-on is 9x14x22. If the airlines enforced their own limits, this would not be a problem. In my opinion, this pushes the burden onto the TSA which is already understaffed at most airports.
May 6, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterMatthew

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.