Quantcast
Forum

 

SEARCH THIS BLOG
« Netbooks so yesterday | Main | Bin-tastic Bombardier »
Wednesday
May262010

More checkpoint follies - bogus or heinous?

For real? Scam? Better stick with that cool $29 Casio watch, just in case:

Imagine being ordered by airport security workers to put your very expensive watch on a scanning belt, over your objections. Then imagine going to retrieve it and it’s gone.

A Baker County woman says that experience at Norfolk International Airport in Virginia last year  cost her a $24,000 Rolex her husband saved up to buy her on her 50th birthday.

Now she’s suing the U.S. Transportation Security Administration after the agency rejected her claim letter and her congressman unsuccessfully attempted to intervene. - Florida Times-Union/jacksonville.com

Lesson - bling is not the thing at the checkpoint.

Reader Comments (17)

I disagree with the lesson stated. Bling should be fine, if that's your taste and you want to travel with it. The lesson here is that the TSA's corruption knows no bounds. The very expensive security theater we pay for in the form of TSA harassment should be abandoned.
May 26, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterSC
Whoa! Read the article. That's amazing. They totally set her up. And she was quite stupid to agree to this stuff. It's amazing how easily people are bullied. And women are unfortunately a target even more than men. Appalling.

Here are some things you can do to avoid this kind of stuff.

1. WTMDs have three tiers: bottom, center, high. They each respond separately. The watch in questions weighs under 100g. It is highly unlikely that it will even trigger the detector. Yesterday I walked through the WTMD at AUS with a 165g watch. Not the faintest alarm. People behind me were beeping so I know the machine was working.

2. When you walk through the detector hold your watch arm straight out in front of you. Walk the watch through it first. It is a trick I was told by a detector agent at a German airport. Works very well. Put your boarding pass in that hand. Often you are required to hang on to that anyway.

3. I don't think they can require you to take off the watch BEFORE you even walk through the detector. This is where they screwed her. They can ask you to get rid of metallic objects ONCE you set off the alarm but not before. If you beep they will use the wand and can hand search you. But the watch shouldn't need to go through the X-ray machine.

4. It makes sense to put any really conspicuous items you have on into a closeable interior pocket of a jacket BEFORE you arrive at the checkpoint. This way they will not see it directly first. They will only get the X-ray image which won't be enough to determine if it's of value. Thus not enough to determine if it's worth stealing it. It will also make it much harder to steal it because fumbling with the jacket is not easy.

5. In that sense, do NOT use the little trays they offer for valuables. That just makes it easier for them to locate your valuables. It's a set-up.

6. TSA requires you to keep your belonging in sight at all times. They call it "maintain visual contact", I think. You should insist on that. If ever they don't allow this call a supervisor immediately, call the cops, file a written complaint and get all the names and batch numbers. If they use the "Do you want to fly today" threat raise a ruckus immediately.

7. You don't need to scream at them but raise your voice to the level where everyone can hear you. You do want witnesses and you do want to make it visible to the public that things are not going as they should.

What happened to this woman should be a lesson to all of us to watch out for what the TSA is doing much better than the TSA watching out for terrorists.

I travel with nice watches frequently, so as you can tell I've given some thought to the matter to prevent exactly this kind of horror scenario from happening. The best way to transport a nice watch is on your arm. Don't take it off. There is no need when you use the trick in #2.

Till
May 27, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterTill
I've only had to take a watch off once, and that was a long time ago. As I read this article I began to suspect it might be a hoax. I can't remember ever seeing a Thousands Standing Around person ask a traveller to take off a watch. The usual offending items are belt buckles, heavy bracelets, and coins. This article may need more research.
May 27, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterMonte
I'm with Till. I put everything in a fastened pocket - in my jacket or bag. Even better is a zippered pouch in a zippered bag pocket. No beeps, no creeps, no hassle. Even if they detail search your bag it usually goes quickly if you're a neat packer -- and you don't have much in the bag.
May 27, 2010 | Registered CommenterFrank@OBOW
And, Monte - I'm with you too - it's possible the claim is bogus. But it is believable.
May 27, 2010 | Registered CommenterFrank@OBOW
I too agree with Till - and thanks for the interesting idea to walk through with one's watch / arms outstretched through the metal detector.

I usually remove any valuables (watch, jewellery etc) and place them in a zip-top baggie which then goes in a pocket of my bag or coat. Once through the screeninn process - watch etc is worn again. So far, the only time I was ever stopped - metal in a hair barrette that I forgot to remove, and a piece of lead crystal that I received as a gift - it looked like a solid black lump on the screen, according to the TSA agent. (Good thing they didn't confiscate it, this heavy "rock" could have been used as a weapon!)

Even if this story is bogus, still reminds us to proceed with caution!
May 27, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterMaria
I have seen heavy steel watches set off the detectors at various times, but when I invested in a fine watch I specifically picked one that was made entirely of titanium. Titanium has a much lower magnetic signature than steel (magnets won't even stick to it) and it has never ever set off a metal detector (not even a wand at a few inches). If your watch is hidden underneath a sleeve as mine always is, they can't even have a reason to ask you to take it off.
May 27, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterSam
Hey. Longtime reader, first time commenter.

As others have suggested, put your watch, wallet, loose change, cell phone, belt and jewelry in your carry-on bag before you go through security. This keeps them out of sight, reducing the temptation for a crooked security official or fellow passenger to swipe them when you aren't looking. Also, it speeds up your progress through security. If you're running to catch a flight, you can quickly grab your carry-on bag once it's through the scanner and make a dash for the gate, knowing everything important is already in the carry-on and you're not forgetting your wallet in a plastic security tray.

There's usually plenty of time to zip up all those objects into the front pocket of your carry-on while you're waiting in line at security. If security officials need to open your carry-on bag, they ask permission first and then open the bag in front of you. If they don't ask permission, you're probably in some far-flung country where you shouldn't have loose valuables in the first place; your cash should be in a money belt and your passport should be in a secure pocket on your body.

As a general traveling rule, I try to use sound judgment when deciding what watch to wear. I don't have super fancy watches, but even my $80 Timex from Target has attracted attention from locals in parts of the world. In Vienna, no one notices your Rolex, but in Nairobi, people might eye your Swatch. In some places, I'd rather travel with a rugged $50 Casio that I don't care about than have my vacation ruined when someone robs me on the street because my TAG Heuer was too big and shiny. Not that I have TAG Heuer, but you get the point.
May 27, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterChris
Welcome, Chris, to the world of OBOW commenters. Tom Bihn makes an assortment of pouches, clear and otherwise, that serve this purpose well. My wife has taken all of mine....
May 27, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterBrad
"Security cameras apparently weren’t working, according to Showalter and TSA’s response to inquiries by U.S. Rep. Ander Crenshaw, R-Fla."

I'm no security expert, but wouldn't non-functioning security cameras in that kind of environment mandate a priority repair and security change? That's like the metal detectors or x-ray machines not working, they should be considered critical to the overall strategy.

This also brings up the point of are there cameras pointed at the TSA agents at their screening stations? Banks aim cameras at their teller stations more to keep an eye on the teller than a potential bank robber.
May 27, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterPaul
Some of the best travel advice I ever received was "don't take anything you will cry over if it is lost or stolen." This was in 1983 as I prepared to tour the country in a bus with a drum and bugle corps, so obviously way before TSA.

That being said, what I do bring (nice costume jewelry) will be in a bag with at least two zippers between it and TSA.
May 27, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterMags
In this case, the valuable in question was an expensive watch. It just as easily could have been essential medical equipment, chemicals, or explosives, etc. Regardless of who perpetrated the crime, it is obvious that "security" has become an oxymoron for travelers.
May 27, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterLaurie
Sam, good point on Titanium and hiding the watch under a sleeve. Certainly a good method but one that is more for the male traveler given that there are few Titanium watches for women and that they don't usually wear cuffs like we do.

With the "walk watch through" method outlined in my post even a heavy steel watch shouldn't set off the WTMD. But some are adjusted to be more sensitive than others. So it's not a sure fire thing.

Chris, good point on making the watch inconspicuous, which this Rolex clearly wasn't. When I went to visit my then GF in Mexico City she told me explicitly to not take a nice watch. I took a yellow plastic G-Shock. She said: "OK, that's not expensive but it will still get noticed. Would have been better to buy a $10 Timex." Well, a man has his standards, is all I can say.
May 28, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterTill
I'm afraid I don't have a lot of sympathy. If you own a 24 thousand dollar watch - especially if you are silly enough to travel with it - you can afford to lose it. That kind of watch is not about telling time, but bragging about wealth. In most of the world, even an honest person would be tempted to take a pruning shear to your forearm to score something that valuable.
May 31, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterKLW
I tend to think the claim is likely credible. It's hard to believe that someone with a reasonably professional background who can save up $24k to buy a watch has nothing better to do than make up lawsuits, particularly one where the outcome is $24,000, relatively small potatoes as far as lawsuits go. What she has done takes a good deal of effort-- contacting her congressman, filing a suit, etc...

I travel with an expensive stainless steel watch, and often put it in my bag, as others have suggested. I have forgotten a few times, and usually it goes OK, but once in Munich it set the detector off.

My watch is insured against theft. I've never had to file a claim though, so I don't really know how useful the insurance is.

Lastly, the old broken surveillance camera line is a joke. As one poster pointed out, the cameras would seem to be integral to the process. We've heard that excuse before. Surveillance cameras are actually pretty reliable pieces of equipment, and they aren't particularly expensive. Evidence of this can be found in the fact that countless low budget convenience stores and gas stations have functioning security cameras.
June 1, 2010 | Unregistered CommenterHigh Roller
I'm certainly not defending TSA, but traveling with expensive stuff like that just isn't a good idea IMHO. It just gives you something to worry about that you could do without. When I travel I wear a cheap Timex digital watch that serves double duty as an alarm clock. That said, if someone chooses to bring their $$$ toys on a flight, they should be able to without having to worry about security employees stealing it.
July 9, 2010 | Unregistered Commenterp23brian

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.