Quantcast
Forum

 

SEARCH THIS BLOG
« Daily Roundup--October 6, 2011 | Main | Daily Roundup--October 5, 2011 »
Wednesday
Oct052011

Gear Review: Rufus Roo

Flying on an airline that has strict carry-on rules but you don’t want to check luggage or pay fees? A new product to hit the market is the Rufus Roo.

This jacket/poncho has six pockets, comes in six colors all with red zippers except black where you have a choice of red or black zippers, red logos on front and back, and is made of 100% “see-thru” polyester. Yes, that’s right, see-thru. I ordered one in black with black zippers and when held up to the light you can see right through it.  All of the other colors have red trim zippers

 

It’s suggested no more than 10kg (22 lbs) be loaded onto the jacket. They also show someone carrying an Ipad. Sorry, I wouldn’t trust any heavy electronics to these pockets. Clothing, yes, but nothing of real value. It also looks bulky when packed. You won’t be fooling anyone. 

The Rufus Roo comes in three sizes: Adult Large ( covering everything from Large to XX-Large), Medium and Child sizes. The large weighs 350 grams (just over 12 ounces.)

$49 for adult sizes/32.50 for kids size. Shipping is a flat $10 for one or more items. The item is shipped from the UK. 

The idea is good. Unfortunately, the execution needs work. That being said, if you travel on one of the restrictive airlines and don’t mind looking a little silly to save money, then the Rufus Roo might be the way to go. 

For more information, go to the Rufus Roo website. . 

 

Rufus Roo supplied the product for review. 

 

Addendum: Let me clarify my “see-thru” comment. You can’t see into the pockets but if you hold up the jacket in areas where there are no pockets, like the back, you can see thru it with a light in the background. You can’t see through when it’s being worn. (My apologies to Paula S. for not clarifying this before her comment was made.)

Reader Comments (8)

See-through isn't good, it defeats the purpose of hiding the items you didn't put in your carry-on.
I'll stick with my Casco Bay jacket.
October 5, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterPaula S
It looks like it would be a great idea but I think it would be uncomfortable to wear if you packed it to the maximum capacity of 22 lbs.
October 5, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterL. Bennett
Thanks for the explanation Frank.
After looking at all the photos on the web site, I think it looks better on children and would be handy for kids to carry their toy or games etc. then mum and dad wouldn't have to keep delving into their bags.
October 6, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterPaula S
MY WIFE wouldn't be caught dead boarding a plane wearing a Rufus Roo! This garment deserves a cheer: give me a U, give me a G, give me an L...give me a Y....what's that spell!?
October 6, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterAlan B
That vest is to Scottevest, as a duct tapewallet is to a leather wallet.
October 6, 2011 | Unregistered Commenterstevenshytle
+1 to stevenshytle

If you want to travel with pocket-intensive clothing instead of bags, you can use Scottevest and look like a normal person. Their stuff is high quality and there's a big range of styles.
October 6, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterMattBH
Just have a nice bag for traveling . :)
October 21, 2011 | Unregistered CommenterHannah Hamilton
I am going on a little adventure along with some friends and bought similar jackets in plus size for one of my friend from http://casual-plus.com who is on a heavier side.
January 13, 2015 | Unregistered CommenterJennifer Cope

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
All HTML will be escaped. Hyperlinks will be created for URLs automatically.